Governing privacy in knowledge commons [electronic resource] / edited by Madelyn Rose Sanfilippo, Brett M. Frischmann, Katherine J. Strandburg.

Contributor Sanfilippo, Madelyn R. editor.

ImprintCambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2021.

Description1 online resource (xi, 289 pages) : digital, PDF file(s).

Note:Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 22 Feb 2021).

Note:Personal information as a knowledge commons resources / Madelyn Rose Sanfilippo, Brett Frischmann and Katherine J. Strandburg -- How private individuals maintain privacy and govern their own health data cooperative : MIDATA in Switzerland / Felix Gille and Effy Vayena -- Pooling mental health data with Chatbots Michael Mattioli -- Privacy in practice : a socio-technical integration research (STIR) study of rules-in-use within institutional research / Kyle M. L. Jones and Chase McCoy -- Public Facebook groups for political activism / Madelyn Rose Sanfilippo and Katherine J. Strandburg -- The republic of letters and the origins of scientific knowledge commons knowledge commons / Michael J. Madison -- Privacy and knowledge production across contexts / Brett Frischmann, Katherine Haenschen and Ari Ezra Waldman -- Governing the Internet of everything / Scott J. Shackelford -- Contextual integrity as a gauge for governing knowledge commons / Yan Shvartzshnaider, Madelyn Rose Sanfilippo and Noah Apthorpe -- Designing for the privacy commons / Darakhshan J. Mir.

Note:Governing Privacy in Knowledge Commons explores how privacy impacts knowledge production, community formation, and collaborative governance in diverse contexts, ranging from academia and IoT, to social media and mental health. Using nine new case studies and a meta-analysis of previous knowledge commons literature, the book integrates the Governing Knowledge Commons framework with Helen Nissenbaum's Contextual Integrity framework. The multidisciplinary case studies show that personal information is often a key component of the resources created by knowledge commons. Moreover, even when it is not the focus of the commons, personal information governance may require community participation and boundaries. Taken together, the chapters illustrate the importance of exit and voice in constructing and sustaining knowledge commons through appropriate personal information flows. They also shed light on the shortcomings of current notice-and-consent style regulation of social media platforms. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.

E-Resource:Electronic resource: Click for access to full text electronic version of this title.

This item has been checked out 0 time(s)
and currently has 0 hold request(s).