HomeHelpSearchVideo SearchAudio SearchLabel Display ReserveMy AccountLibrary Map
Description Field Ind Field Data
Leader LDR nam i 00
Control # 1 EDZ0001691964
Control # Id 3 StDuBDS
Date 5 20210929161002.0
Linking 6 m||||||||d||||||||
Phy Descr 7 cr |||||||||||
Fixed Data 8 170530s2017 nyu fob 001|0|eng|d
ISBN 20    $a9780190683436 (ebook) :$cNo price
Obsolete 39    $a317255$cTLC
Cat. Source 40    $aStDuBDS$beng$cStDuBDS$erda$epn
LC Call 50  0 $aQ223$b.O94 2017
Dewey Class 82 04 $a501.4$223
Title 245 04 $aThe Oxford handbook of the science of science communication$h[electronic resource] /$cedited by Kathleen Hall Jamieson, Dan M. Kahan, and Dietram A. Scheufele.
Tag 264 264  1 $aNew York :$bOxford University Press,$c2017.
Phys Descrpt 300    $a1 online resource.
Tag 336 336    $atext$2rdacontent
Tag 337 337    $acomputer$2rdamedia
Tag 338 338    $aonline resource$2rdacarrier
Series:Diff 490 $aOxford library of psychology
Series:Diff 490 $aOxford handbooks online
Note:Bibliog 504    $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
Note:Content 505 00 $tIntroduction: Why Science Communication? /$rDan M. Kahan, Dietram A. Scheufele, Kathleen Hall Jamieson --$tPublication Bias in Science: What is it, Why is it Problematic, and How Can It Be Addressed? /$rAndrew Brown, Tapan Mehta, David Allison --$tStatistical Biases in Science Communication: What We Know About Them and How They Can Be Addressed /$rJohn Ioannidis --$tIs there a Hype Problem in Science? If so, How is it Addressed? /$rPeter Weingart --$tIs there a Retraction Problem? And, If So, What Do We Know About How It Is and Can Be Addressed? Is there a Retraction Problem? And, If So, What Do We Know About How It Is and Can Be Addressed? /$rAdam Marcus, Ivan Oransky --$tA Recap: Identifying and Overcoming Challenges to Science Featured in Attacks on Science /$rJoseph Hilgard --$tA Comparative Study of Communication about Food Safety Before, During, and After the (3z(BMad Cow(3y(B Crisis /$rMatteo Ferrari --$tCross-National Comparative Communication and Deliberation about the Risks of Nanotechnologies /$rNick Pidgeon, Barbara Herr Harthorn, Terre Satterfield, Christina Demski --$tCommunications about Biotechnologies and GMOs across Europe /$rHeinz Bonfadelli --$tA Tale of Two Vaccines - and their Science Communication Environments /$rDan M. Kahan, Ashley Landrum --$tA Recap: Science Communication in Action /$rHeather Akin --$tThe Need for a Science of Science Communication: Communicating Science's Values and Norms /$rKathleen Hall Jamieson --$tScience Communication at Scientific Institutions /$rTiffany Lohwater, Martin Storksdieck --$tThe Role of Scholarly Presses and Journals /$rBarbara Kline Pope, Elizabeth Marincola --$tThe Role of Governmental Organizations in Communicating About Regulating Science /$rJeffrey Morris --$tScience Communication and Museums' Changing Roles /$rVictoria Cain, Karen Rader --$tThe Role of Funding Organizations: Foundations /$rElizabeth Good Christopherson --$tPromoting Popular Understanding of Science and Health through Social Networks /$rBrian G. Southwell --$tDesigning Public Deliberation at the Intersection of Science and Public Policy /$rJohn Gastil --$tTranslating Science Into Policy and Legislation: Evidence-based policy making /$rJason Gallo --$tA Recap: The Role of Intermediaries in Communicating Science: A Synthesis /$rAshley Landrum --$tThe (Changing) Nature of Scientist-Media Interactions: A Cross National Analysis /$rSara Yeo, Dominique Brossard --$tOverview of the Science of Science Communication /$rHeather Akin --$tNew Models of Knowledge-Based Journalism /$rMatthew Nisbet, Declan Fahy --$tCitizens Making Sense of Science Issues: Supply and Demand Factors for Science News and Information in the Digital Age /$rMichael Xenos --$tThe Changing Popular Images of Science /$rDavid Kirby --$tWhat Do We Know About the Entertainment Industry's Portrayal of Science? How Does it Affect Public Attitudes Toward Science? /$rJames Shanahan --$tHow Narrative Functions in Entertainment to Communicate Science /$rMartin Kaplan, Michael Dahlstrom --$tAssumptions about Science in Satirical News and Late Night Comedy /$rLauren Feldman --$tA Recap: The Role, Power, and Peril of Media for the Communication of Science /$rNan Li, Robert Lull --$tCountering False Beliefs: An Analysis of the Evidence and Recommendations of Best Practices for the Retraction and Correction of Scientific Misinformation /$rMan-pui Sally Chan, Christopher Jones, Dolores Albarracin --$tUsing Frames to Make Scientific Communication More Effective /$rJames N. Druckman, Arthur Lupia --$tPhilosophical Impediments to Citizens' Use of Science /$rJonathan Baron --$tOn the Sources of Ordinary Science Knowledge and Extraordinary Science Ignorance /$rDan M. Kahan --$tOvercoming Confirmation and Blind Spot Bias When Communicating Science /$rKate Kenski --$tUnderstanding and Overcoming Selective Exposure and Judgement When Communicating About Science /$rNatalie Jomini Stroud --$tOvercoming Innumeracy and the Use of Heuristics When Communicating Science /$rEllen Peters --$tOvercoming Biases in Processing of Time Series Data about Climate /$rBruce Hardy, Kathleen Hall Jamieson --$tUnderstanding and Overcoming Fear Of the Unnatural in Discussion of GMOs /$rRobert Lull, Dietram A. Scheufele --$tProtecting or Polluting the Science Communication Environment? The Case of Childhood Vaccines /$rDan M. Kahan --$tOvercoming false causal attribution: debunking the MMR-autism association /$rNan Li, Talia Stroud, Kathleen Hall Jamieson --$tOvercoming the challenges of communicating uncertainty across national contexts /$rMichael Siegrist, Christina Hartmann --$tA Recap: Heuristics, Biases, Values and Other Challenges to Communicating Science /$rHeather Akin, Ashley Landrum --$tConclusion: On the Horizon--The Changing Science Communication Environment /$rDietram A. Scheufele, Kathleen Hall Jamieson, Dan M. Kahan --$tHow Changing Media Structures are Affecting Science News Coverage /$rMike S. Schäfer --$tWhat the Public Thinks and Knows about Science: And Why it Matters /$rWilliam Hallman --$tScientific Controversies: Can the Science of Science Communication Provide Management Guidance or only Analysis? /$rBruce Lewenstein --$tA Recap: The Science of Communicating Science /$rJoseph Hilgard, Nan Li --$t(3z(BSelf-Correcting(3y:(B How Retractions and Peer-Review Problems are Exploited to Attack Science /$rJoseph Hilgard, Kathleen Hall Jamieson.
Abstract 520 $aStarting by establishing the need for a science of science communication, this handbook provides an overview of the area. It examines sources of science knowledge and the ways in which changing media structures affect it, reveals what the public thinks about science, and situates current scientific controversies in their historical contexts. Challenges to science including difficulties in peer review, rising numbers of retractions, publication and statistical biases, and hype. Successes and failures in communicating about four controversies are discussed, and the ways in which elite intermediaries communicate science. The final section identifies the ways in which human biases that can affect communicated science can be overcome.
Audience 521    $aSpecialized.
Tag 588 588    $aDescription based on online resource; title from home page (viewed on May 31, 2017).
Subj:Topical 650  0 $aCommunication in science.
Subj:Topical 650  0 $aScience$xLanguage.
AE:Pers Name 700 $aJamieson, Kathleen Hall,$eeditor.
AE:Pers Name 700 $aKahan, Dan M.$eeditor.
AE:Pers Name 700 $aScheufele, Dietram,$eeditor.
Host Item 773 $tBuhl Oxford eBooks
SE:Ufm Title 830  0 $aOxford library of psychology.
SE:Ufm Title 830  0 $aOxford handbooks online.
Elec Loc'n 856 40 $uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190497620.001.0001$yClick for access to full text electronic version of this title.